The HCL Review Podcast

Nested Learning: A New Paradigm for Adaptive AI Systems, by Jonathan H. Westover PhD

Abstract: This article examines Nested Learning (NL), a novel framework that reconceptualizes neural networks as hierarchical systems of interconnected optimization problems operating at multiple temporal scales. Drawing from neuroscientific principles of memory consolidation and Google Research's recent theoretical work, we explore how NL addresses fundamental limitations in current deep learning systems—particularly their static nature after deployment and inability to continually acquire new capabilities. The framework reveals that existing architectures like Transformers and optimizers such as Adam are special cases of nested associative memory systems, each compressing information within distinct "context flows." We analyze NL's implications for organizational AI strategy, examining three core innovations: deep optimizers with enhanced memory architectures, self-modifying sequence models, and continuum memory systems. Through practitioner-oriented analysis of experimental results and architectural patterns, we demonstrate how NL principles enable more adaptive, efficient, and cognitively plausible AI systems. This synthesis connects theoretical advances to practical deployment considerations for enterprises navigating the evolving landscape of foundation models and continuous learning requirements.

From Individual Expertise to Collective Intelligence: Building Learning-Capable Teams, by Jonathan H. Westover PhD

Abstract: Organizations increasingly rely on teams to navigate complexity, drive innovation, and adapt to rapid change, yet practitioners often lack evidence-based guidance on which investments genuinely foster team learning. This article synthesizes findings from a comprehensive meta-analysis by Nellen, Gijselaers, and Grohnert (2020) examining 50 studies across 4,778 professional teams in manufacturing, healthcare, product development, and professional services. The analysis reveals that four emergent states—psychological safety, shared cognition, team potency/efficacy, and cohesion—explain substantially more variance in team learning than direct organizational interventions. However, organizations can indirectly influence these states through strategic deployment of job resources, cultivation of supportive culture and climate, design of enabling infrastructure, and enactment of top-level leadership behaviors. The evidence challenges conventional training-centric approaches, pointing instead toward systemic environmental design. Practitioners gain specific, quantified guidance on relative effect sizes to prioritize investments; researchers receive a consolidated framework identifying robust relationships and highlighting gaps requiring further investigation.

Navigating the Shift to Skills-Based Talent Management: Evidence-Based Strategies for Organizational Success, by Jonathan H. Westover PhD

Abstract: Organizations are increasingly moving away from traditional job-based hiring and development models toward skills-based talent management approaches. This shift reflects changing workforce expectations, technological disruption, and the need for organizational agility in volatile business environments. This article examines the organizational and individual consequences of adopting skills-based frameworks, drawing on research in organizational psychology, human resource management, and change management. Evidence suggests that skills-based approaches can improve talent mobility, development effectiveness, and organizational adaptability when implemented thoughtfully. The article presents evidence-based interventions including transparent skills frameworks, internal mobility infrastructure, capability-building investments, and technology-enabled talent systems. Three pillars for long-term success are explored: psychological contract recalibration, distributed talent stewardship, and continuous learning ecosystems. Practitioners will find actionable guidance for navigating this transition while maintaining trust and performance.

Organizational Learning from Crisis: Evidence-Based Strategies for Building Adaptive Capacity

Abstract: Organizational crises—whether triggered by pandemics, natural disasters, technological failures, or economic shocks—present critical junctures that can either catalyze profound learning or entrench dysfunctional routines. This article synthesizes empirical research on how organizations learn from crisis events, drawing on systematic reviews, case studies, and conceptual frameworks to identify evidence-based practices that enable adaptive capacity. We examine the organizational and individual consequences of crisis experiences, explore specific interventions that facilitate learning across anticipation, coping, and adaptation phases, and propose strategic pillars for building long-term resilience. By integrating scholarly insight with practitioner-oriented guidance, this article offers leaders actionable pathways to transform disruption into durable competitive advantage and organizational renewal.

How Public Service Motivation, Red Tape, and Job Satisfaction Shape Innovation in the Public Sector, by Jonathan H. Westover PhD

Abstract: Public sector organizations face persistent pressure to innovate while navigating bureaucratic constraints that often inhibit creativity and experimentation. This article examines the interplay between public service motivation (PSM), organizational red tape, and job satisfaction in shaping innovation outcomes within government and nonprofit contexts. Drawing on organizational behavior literature, institutional theory, and evidence from diverse public agencies, we demonstrate that high PSM can buffer against the demotivating effects of red tape while simultaneously catalyzing innovative behaviors when coupled with adequate job satisfaction. Conversely, excessive procedural burden systematically erodes both satisfaction and innovation capacity, even among highly mission-driven employees. We present evidence-based organizational responses spanning transparent governance reforms, procedural rationalization, participatory innovation structures, and capability-building initiatives. The synthesis reveals that sustainable public sector innovation requires intentional management of the psychological contract, distributed leadership models, and continuous learning systems that honor both accountability imperatives and creative problem-solving.

The AI Ethics Gap in K–12 Education: Why Technical Training Alone Fails Our Teachers and Students

Abstract: Artificial intelligence is rapidly entering K–12 classrooms worldwide, yet most educators lack formal training in AI—and even fewer have received instruction in AI ethics. Emerging evidence suggests that approximately two-thirds of teachers have no formal AI preparation, while those who do receive training typically encounter tool-focused, technical instruction rather than comprehensive ethics education. Meanwhile, government mandates requiring AI instruction are accelerating, and technology companies are scaling products with unprecedented speed. This disconnect leaves teachers, families, and students vulnerable to documented harms, including AI-related psychological distress. This article examines the current landscape of AI readiness in schools, analyzes organizational and individual consequences of the ethics training gap, and presents evidence-based interventions—from educator capability building and transparent governance frameworks to cross-sector partnerships and ethical curriculum design. Drawing on established research in organizational learning, educational technology adoption, and professional development, the article offers a roadmap for school leaders, policymakers, and technology companies committed to building sustainable, human-centered AI ecosystems in education.

Unlocking Human Potential: A Capability Approach to Adult Learning and Organizational Development, by Jonathan H. Westover PhD

Abstract: Organizations increasingly recognize that workforce capability development extends beyond technical skills acquisition to encompass broader human flourishing and agency. Drawing on the capability approach framework, this article examines how organizational adult learning initiatives can expand employees' real freedoms to achieve valued outcomes rather than merely delivering standardized training interventions. Evidence suggests that participation inequalities persist across socioeconomic, educational, and demographic lines, with significant consequences for both organizational performance and individual wellbeing. This review synthesizes research on capability-oriented learning systems, highlighting evidence-based organizational responses including conversion factor support, choice architecture redesign, social capability building, and agency-enhancing practices. Forward-looking recommendations emphasize psychological contract recalibration, distributed leadership structures, and continuous learning ecosystems that recognize learning as intrinsically valuable while simultaneously advancing organizational objectives. Organizations adopting capability-sensitive approaches demonstrate enhanced innovation capacity, employee retention, and adaptive performance in volatile environments.
 

The Evolution of AI as Workplace Partner: From Chatbot Novelty to Strategic Collaborator, by Jonathan H. Westover PhD

Abstract: Three years after ChatGPT's launch, artificial intelligence has evolved from generating coherent text to functioning as a collaborative workplace partner capable of autonomous planning, coding, research, and analysis. This article examines the transformation of AI capabilities through the lens of Google's Gemini 3 and similar agentic systems, analyzing their implications for organizational work design, human-AI collaboration models, and knowledge work transformation. Drawing on recent demonstrations of AI performing graduate-level research, autonomous coding, and multi-step project execution, we explore how organizations can effectively integrate these capabilities while maintaining human oversight and strategic direction. The shift from "human fixing AI mistakes" to "human directing AI work" represents a fundamental reimagining of knowledge work distribution, requiring new frameworks for task allocation, quality assurance, and capability development. Evidence suggests successful integration depends on treating AI as managed collaborators rather than automated tools, with clear governance structures, iterative feedback mechanisms, and realistic expectations about both capabilities and limitations.

Leadership as Plumbing and Poetry: Why March's Counterintuitive Insight Matters More Than Ever

Abstract: James March distinguished between leadership as "plumbing"—the rational work of plans, structures, and controls—and leadership as "poetry"—the imaginative work of meaning-making, emotion, and beauty. Contrary to conventional leadership scholarship emphasizing measurable outcomes, March argued that leaders' poetic impact on human experience and meaning exceeds their ability to execute instrumental change. This article synthesizes March's framework with contemporary organizational research to examine why leaders' symbolic and emotional influence often proves more durable than their structural interventions. Drawing on evidence from meaning-making research, organizational symbolism studies, and practitioner accounts across healthcare, technology, and public sectors, we explore how leaders shape collective imagination, ritual, and aspiration—even when tangible outcomes remain elusive. The analysis offers three forward-looking capabilities for twenty-first-century leadership: aesthetic consciousness, symbolic stewardship, and poetic resilience. Organizations seeking sustainable impact may benefit more from cultivating leaders' capacity for beauty and meaning than from optimizing their technical execution.

The Case for a Chief Innovation and Transformation Officer in the Age of AI, by Jonathan H. Westover PhD

Abstract: Artificial intelligence is reshaping how organizations operate, yet many enterprises approach AI adoption primarily as a technical implementation challenge. This narrow focus overlooks the profound cultural, structural, and human capital transformations that determine whether AI investments deliver value or create organizational dysfunction. This article examines why traditional leadership structures struggle to manage AI-driven change and presents evidence for establishing a Chief Innovation and Transformation Officer (CITO) role. Drawing on organizational change literature, digital transformation research, and examples from healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing sectors, we explore how CITOs bridge the gap between technical capability and organizational readiness. The analysis reveals that successful AI adoption requires dedicated executive attention to culture change, workforce reskilling, cross-functional collaboration, and the redesign of work itself—responsibilities that fall outside conventional C-suite domains yet prove critical to realizing AI's potential.